Re: 2.19.90 progress



ons, 15.08.2007 kl. 07.18 -0600, skrev Elijah Newren:
> On 8/15/07, Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've uploaded the modules and version files etc to the team directory on
> > f.g.o.
> 
> Thanks for taking care of this release, Kjartan.  A few notes:
> 
> > So far the following things have popped up:
> >
> > - Missing gtksourceview-1.0 dep in gnome-suites-2.20.modules. I added
> > one from the previous release moduleset
> 
> Yeah, convert-to-tarballs.py doesn't like gtksourceview and
> gtksourceview-1.0 both existing and trying to grab tarballs of similar
> names.  We've been manually adding it for each of the releases so far.
>  If anyone wants to fix up the script, that'd be great.  :-)
> 
> > - gtk+-2.11.6 doesn't build against my cups libs. This is fixed in gtk+
> > trunk.
> >
> > - mozilla doesn't build here because of some problems with
> 
> mozilla is a royal pain in the butt.  When my build system was a
> 64-bit system, I gave up entirely on building mozilla and just used
> the distributor versions (adding mozilla to my skip list in my
> .jhbuildrc).  I wonder if we should just do that officially and not
> let epiphany or others depend on too-recent versions of mozilla.
> 
> 
> I hit a snag with bug-buddy depending on libelf.h, which I sent a
> separate email about.  I'm also hitting the same tomboy problem as I
> always seem to hit.  I have no idea which library I'm missing, or if I
> just have too old a version of mono (whatever comes with F7).  *shrug*
> 
Just a small update.

- e-d-s doesn't seem to build the exchange stuff by default on my system
at least. That's probably ok, but evolution still tries to build the
exchange operations plugin and that used my system installed e-d-s
headers which were missing a change in api that went in just before the
release. I get the impression that it should check more carefully
whether the installed libs in the build prefix are up to date instead of
just building blindly against a system installed one. Maybe just upping
the dep on e-d-s is enough.

Cheers
Kjartan





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]