Re: 2.15.x schedule first pass

["John (J5) Palmieri" <johnp redhat com>]

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 17:09 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 3/13/06, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com> wrote:
> > On 3/13/06, John (J5) Palmieri <johnp redhat com> wrote:
> > > Not a big deal but does the extra release actually
> > > help or just add more of burden?  I suspect a lot of hacking is going to
> > > go on a GUADEC this year.  Do we do a release directly after or do we
> > > let everyone go home, look over their work and polish it a bit and then
> > > do a release a week later?
> >
> > Yeah, that makes sense.  I can see how this might cause problems.
> > Perhaps someone can come up with suggestions that will handle that
> > problem as well as the potential problems/annoyances I see with the
> > current proposal?  The potential problems I see are:
> 
> Looks like we just have conflicting constraints and no one sees a good
> solution.  We can work around the issues I saw in 2.16, so let's just
> send your proposal to desktop-devel-list.  Do you want to do that?  Or
> should we wait until we have a concrete proposal on the module changes
> (when to propose, when to cut of proposals, when to freeze the list,
> etc.)?

Let me write up that proposal tomorrow and then we can send the two
together.

-- 
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp redhat com>