Re: libxklavier (was Re: Weirdness on ftp)

[Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no>]

ons, 15,.03.2006 kl. 06.38 -0700, skrev Elijah Newren:
> On 3/14/06, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> > Le mardi 14 mars 2006 �2:55 -0700, Elijah Newren a �it :
> > > In a related issue, libxklavier had released 2.1 and 2.2 tarballs
> > > somewhere on sourceforge and it looks like very few people knew about
> > > it (also, 2.1 seems to have disappeared now that 2.2 is out).  2.0
> > > ended up being used in most testing.  Fedora apparently went and took
> > > cvs snapshots of something close to 2.1 for their testing to fix the
> > > bugs in 2.0.  We're currently discussing what we should use (2.0
> > > because it was most widely tested and is the only thing upload to ftp?
> > >  2.1 because it fixes some important bugs in 2.0?  The 2.1-ish cvs
> > > snapshot Fedora is using?  2.2 which showed up only 3 days ago and
> > > probably has hard code freeze breaks?  If any of the latter, we'll
> > > need to install-module it)
> >
> > The last commit for 2.2 was made on 2006-02-14. Fedora seems to use a
> > libxklavier-2.1.0.2006.02.23-2 version. That would be the same code than
> > 2.2.0. If it's true, I'd like to use this one.
> 
> Sounds good to me.

Same here.

Cheers
Kjartan