Re: libxklavier (was Re: Weirdness on ftp)
- From: "Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>
- To: "Vincent Untz" <vuntz gnome org>
- Cc: release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: libxklavier (was Re: Weirdness on ftp)
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:38:52 -0700
On 3/14/06, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> Le mardi 14 mars 2006 à 12:55 -0700, Elijah Newren a écrit :
> > In a related issue, libxklavier had released 2.1 and 2.2 tarballs
> > somewhere on sourceforge and it looks like very few people knew about
> > it (also, 2.1 seems to have disappeared now that 2.2 is out). 2.0
> > ended up being used in most testing. Fedora apparently went and took
> > cvs snapshots of something close to 2.1 for their testing to fix the
> > bugs in 2.0. We're currently discussing what we should use (2.0
> > because it was most widely tested and is the only thing upload to ftp?
> > 2.1 because it fixes some important bugs in 2.0? The 2.1-ish cvs
> > snapshot Fedora is using? 2.2 which showed up only 3 days ago and
> > probably has hard code freeze breaks? If any of the latter, we'll
> > need to install-module it)
>
> The last commit for 2.2 was made on 2006-02-14. Fedora seems to use a
> libxklavier-2.1.0.2006.02.23-2 version. That would be the same code than
> 2.2.0. If it's true, I'd like to use this one.
Sounds good to me.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]