Re: [draft] Module decisions for GNOME 2.14
- From: Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com>
- To: Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>
- Cc: release-team gnome org, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [draft] Module decisions for GNOME 2.14
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:52:42 -0600
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 13:43 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> I disagree that it's inappropriate to add another library to our sets;
> I was thinking of writing one for 2.16 that I think we need, and I'm
> sure there's other libraries that would be great to add. Now, it may
> not be appropriate to add libsexy, but that's much different. Also, I
> was mainly against its inclusion on the basis that it's really late in
> the cycle and between this issue and UI guidelines for notifications
> we may as well wait.
libsexy is some dude's cool widgets thrown into a library [1].
Just how many of those does libnotify need? Can they live in libnotify
for now?
Let's not add yet another random dependency to the stack --- in three
years, we'll have Project Ridley Version Two to get rid of libsexy
anyway, because those widgets will have become unmaintained.
If the widgets get polished enough *AND* are generally useful *AND* get
documented, we can push them easily into GTK+. If they are really
special-purpose, they deserve to be just where they are needed.
[1] Yes, they are very cool and all that.
Federico
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]