Re: Feature Freeze Break or Not Questions

On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 13:27 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Luis Villa">
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:28:33 -0500, Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>
> > wrote:
> > > My personal belief is that freeze is more guideline than hard rule,
> > 
> > Hrm. This probably came out wrong. Let me try again:
> > 
> > The freeze is in place because, in general, we have to be
> > paranoid/cautious about stability. Evo is a special case, since it has a
> > full-time, dedicated developer team, which no other group of maintainers
> > is. So, if we're going to have  a freeze because we're paranoid about
> > quality, evo is the obvious group to make a big exception for, since (at
> > least in theory) they should have more resources for bugfixing late in the
> > cycle.
> Heh, that's certainly closer to the truth than the previous post (whee, do
> anything you want!). ;-)

FWIW, its not my intention to do what ever I want, just make some
corrections to large feature sets like "online/offline support".

JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]