Re: Feature Freeze Break or Not Questions
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>
- Cc: release-team gnome org, JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- Subject: Re: Feature Freeze Break or Not Questions
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:27:19 +1100
<quote who="Luis Villa">
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:28:33 -0500, Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>
> wrote:
> > My personal belief is that freeze is more guideline than hard rule,
>
> Hrm. This probably came out wrong. Let me try again:
>
> The freeze is in place because, in general, we have to be
> paranoid/cautious about stability. Evo is a special case, since it has a
> full-time, dedicated developer team, which no other group of maintainers
> is. So, if we're going to have a freeze because we're paranoid about
> quality, evo is the obvious group to make a big exception for, since (at
> least in theory) they should have more resources for bugfixing late in the
> cycle.
Heh, that's certainly closer to the truth than the previous post (whee, do
anything you want!). ;-)
- Jeff
--
GUADEC 2005: Stuttgart, Germany http://2005.guadec.org/
Corporate extortionism. Economic contortionism.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]