Re: [Planner] Resource dependencies

[Xavier Ordoquy <xordoquy wanadoo fr>]

On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 17:25, Waldemar Augustyn wrote:
> Task 1 should be decomposed into two tasks with one-to-one
> relationship to resources.  Then, a simple click on the button does
> the job.
> 
> If not, the tool still works. It simply pushes tasks 2 behind task 1
> (assuming the algorithm goes by the task priority and then by the
> order of tasks within the same priority).  If the manager has some
> insight into the nature of the joint work on task 1, he could adjust
> the chart.  
> 
> What's described as difficult requires proper decomposition of task 1,
> but that's something the user should do, not the tool.

Well it can not always be decomposed. I'm thinking about experts that
may have this sort of things to do.

Pushing a task before the other would lead to letting the other resource
on hold for 5 days which is not really acceptable.
On a project with several tasks it can become really hard to move forth
and back to notice those things.