Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf

[Jani tiainen <redetin luukku com>]

Richard Hult wrote:
> On mån, 2004-08-09 at 21:20 +0300, Jani tiainen wrote:
>
>
> > Actually there is native win32 port of libgsf
>
>
> Well, we weren't really using it anyway, so it was silly to link to
> it :)
>
>
> > > Remaining now:
> > >
> > > 1. gnome-canvas, does this build natively? otherwise a port is needed
> >
> > In theory yes, since libart_lgpl and libglade has been ported on win32...
>
>
> Looks like there is already native win32 support in gnome-canvas from a
> quick glance.
>
>
> > > 3. gnome-print, does this build natively? otherwise make planner build
> > > without it as a last resort
> >
> > I'm having some refences stating that it can be build, only problem is 
> > gconf again...
>
>
> Neither of libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui depends on gconf, at least
> not directly, they seem to have pretty modest requirements actually. I'm
> not sure how it handles the actual runtime communication with printers
> though.

Well, for the record, I will setup MinGW + MSYS again and try to get 
_native_ Planner up and running...