Re: [orca-list] Why feedback of Orca in OS Linux is Annoyingly slower than NVDA in OS Windows? What Should I do for it?
- From: Shadyar Khodayari <shadyar81 gmail com>
- To: Al Sten-Clanton <albert e sten_clanton verizon net>
- Cc: Rynhardt Kruger <rynkruger gmail com>, Orca List <orca-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Why feedback of Orca in OS Linux is Annoyingly slower than NVDA in OS Windows? What Should I do for it?
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:07:36 +0430
Hi
Your suggestion relatively similar to NVDA solution. in the NVDA there
is a shortcut turning flat review on and an other shortcut that
specifies what default mode of flat review is. I my self like this
solution and agree with your solution too.
Shadyar
On 6/14/21, Al Sten-Clanton via orca-list <orca-list gnome org> wrote:
I might agree with this, but I think I have a bad understanding of what
flat review is supposed to do.
I had thought that, for example, the key for reading the current line,
in my case number pad five, would read where my cursor is. The other
number pad keys would read in their various directions, much as with
Speakup.
What I've found is that sometimes the keys work as I expected, as when I
read this message, but often they do not. If I try using the current
line key in the original message, it reads "inbox," the subject, and two
more things that I forget. Using the other number pad keys does not
bring me to the message body. On the website radio.macinmind.com, where
I just tested, flat review sometimes read what I thought it would and
sometimes not, and I haven't yet figured out when it does which.
I've had this problem for a long time, but I didn't mention it that I
remember, so that's on me. It mattered most to me when I wanted to read
around where I was without having to move the arrow keys, so that
getting out of flat review would bring me right back to where I was.
Anyway, since I recall no complaints of this sort during the time I've
been on this list, I thought it was time now to ask what I'm getting
wrong. Then, maybe I can think better about what people are discussing
here.
Thanks for any information or perspectives.
Al
On 6/13/21 3:32 PM, Rynhardt Kruger via orca-list wrote:
Hi,
There are definitely times when reviewing the screen is necessary. I
therefore propose that the user can switch between reviewing the
current object, and reviewing the screen. My suggestion is that the
user can toggle between these two review modes with the key currently
used for entering flat review, as flat review is automatically entered
when a review key is pressed.
Regards,
Rynhardt
On Sun, 13 Jun 2021, 15:39 Kyle via orca-list, <orca-list gnome org
<mailto:orca-list gnome org>> wrote:
When I'm trying to review the screen using flat review, most of
the time
it is because I need to find a certain spot and simulate a mouse
click
or I need to spell a word where my caret is, usually when
browsing, but
also when I find a button, an element in a drop-down box or another
similar item that I need to be able to spell. I tend to care more
about
what is on the screen in the current window at this point than
what is
in the current object. I rather like the idea of "current" keys not
using flat review unless flat review is toggled on either by using
flat
review navigation or by explicitly toggling flat review on. But a
whole
new layer of complexity that is object navigation must be
available only
to users who know what they are doing and explicitly want this
behavior.
The last time I needed NVDA for anything, I found it fairly easy
to use
overall, but there were two things about it that made me want to
throw
my computer out the window. Those two things were the browsing
virtual
buffer and the rather convoluted hierarchical object navigation
that is
nothing at all like what someone looking at the screen would see, and
caused me much pain just trying to get around my screen in places
where
tab focus and other keyboard focus things didn't work as well as they
could have. Is flat review perfect? by no means. But the behavior and
performance of flat review must be improved wherever possible. It
must
not be shoved aside for something as esoteric to the end user as
object
navigation.
~Kyle
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org <mailto:orca-list gnome org>
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]