Re: [orca-list] Why feedback of Orca in OS Linux is Annoyingly slower than NVDA in OS Windows? What Should I do for it?

[Kyle <kyle4jesus gmail com>]

When I'm trying to review the screen using flat review, most of the time 
it is because I need to find a certain spot and simulate a mouse click 
or I need to spell a word where my caret is, usually when browsing, but 
also when I find a button, an element in a drop-down box or another 
similar item that I need to be able to spell. I tend to care more about 
what is on the screen in the current window at this point than what is 
in the current object. I rather like the idea of "current" keys not 
using flat review unless flat review is toggled on either by using flat 
review navigation or by explicitly toggling flat review on. But a whole 
new layer of complexity that is object navigation must be available only 
to users who know what they are doing and explicitly want this behavior. 
The last time I needed NVDA for anything, I found it fairly easy to use 
overall, but there were two things about it that made me want to throw 
my computer out the window. Those two things were the browsing virtual 
buffer and the rather convoluted hierarchical object navigation that is 
nothing at all like what someone looking at the screen would see, and 
caused me much pain just trying to get around my screen in places where 
tab focus and other keyboard focus things didn't work as well as they 
could have. Is flat review perfect? by no means. But the behavior and 
performance of flat review must be improved wherever possible. It must 
not be shoved aside for something as esoteric to the end user as object 
navigation.

~Kyle