GNOME.org
 

Re: [orca-list] Changes/ finetuning for Progressbar Beeps

Who scolded you? I don't read every mail that comes to this list, but care about the topic in question and I 
do not remember such messages, if they were 
there then I say what is wrong with someone who complains about proposals, ideas, innovation, alternatives?
If some one did not like your idea, well they have the right and probably duty to say so, but if they 
complained because you suggested something and did 
the work to make it happen then they should be shot...lol
I must say that if you are saying you only use a one octave, or even two octave range for beeps from 0-100% 
then I think it should be expanded, 3 or 4 
octaves would be brtyter for me.
But even if I wind up not liking what you did, I thank you for doing it, just as I thank everyone who has 
worked on this.
I just received a suggestion to improve something I wrote last night. I may or may not do what was suggested, 
but I saw the logic in it. At the end of the 
day if people feel strongly enough that they prefer the "other way" than what ever is finally kept in orca 
then a patch can be made publicly available.
I just hope that folks decide to use which ever system I like best or I'm gonna stop using orca and go back 
to using a votrax with ms-basic on 5.25I 
floppies...lol
Regards
 

-- 
     B.H.
   Registerd Linux User 521886


  Nolan Darilek wrote:
Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:12:56AM -0500


   The patch I submitted addressed this directly by pegging the range between
   middle C and the octave above, making it fairly easy to know the ranges. I
   wish we could have implemented that rather than scolding me for
   contributing at the time, because that may address all of these concerns
   (including mine as the patch author.)

   On 06/29/2016 08:57 AM, Devin Prater wrote:

     I could see that working, but that’d be even more input to keep track
     of. Panning beeps could be an alternative, for headphone or stereo
     speaker owners, and alternate beeping could be fine for mono folks.
     Sent from my Mac.
     Devin Prater
     [1]r d t prater gmail com

       On Jun 29, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Fernando Botelho
       <[2]Fernando Botelho F123 org> wrote:
       I remember hearing progress beeps on NVDA and also being pretty lost,
       as i did not know how high they were supposed to go.

       I wish both Orca and NVDA could give just a percentage via espeak, or
       if beeping is a must, then alternate between current stage and final
       beep.

       So if final beep were 400hz., then beep alternating 300hz 400hz, 310hz
       400hz, 320hz 400hz, 330hz 400hz, and so forth.

       Best,

       Fernando

       On 06/29/2016 10:36 AM, Devin Prater wrote:

         I’d like progress beeps that pan from left to right instead of using
         pitch, because most of the time I don’t know exactly how high the
         pitch goes.
         Sent from my Mac.

         Devin Prater
         [3]r d t prater gmail com

           On Jun 29, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Peter Vágner [4]<pvdeejay gmail com>
           wrote:

           Hello,

           I have looked at the issue you have linked to and I am somewhat
           shocked that Nolan's patch has been put aside with somewhat
           disrespectfull attitude.

           To us non musicians or not very sensitive to individual tones it
           might appear as something what may not be needed however I know
           some people who might really benefit from having clean predictable
           like implementation Nolan has suggested.

           Can you Chrys and Joanie get back to that please and reconsider
           it?

           Greetings

           Peter

           On 29.06.2016 at 11:55 [5]chrys87 web de<[6]mailto:chrys87 web de>
           wrote:

             Hi Joanie, Hi List,
              I did some finetuning on the progressbar beeps caused by
             userrequests.
             You could find them attached on that ticket:
             
[7]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758328<[8]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758328>
              I made two changes:
             1. make the beeps more short.
             
[9]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330508<[10]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330508>
              2. Ignore Interval for the beeps. That only make sense for
             Output that needs "time to present". People like to activate
             both; Beeps for an progess gues, the voice/ braile output for
             precise information in big intervals.
             
[11]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330509<[12]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330509>
              What does others think about that here?
             cheers chrys

             _______________________________________________
             orca-list mailing list
             [13]orca-list gnome org <[14]mailto:orca-list gnome org>
             
[15]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list<[16]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list>
             Orca
             wiki: [17]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca<[18]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca>
             Orca
             documentation: 
[19]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/<[20]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/>
             GNOME Universal Access
             guide: 
[21]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html<[22]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html>
             Log bugs and feature requests
             at [23]http://bugzilla.gnome.org<[24]http://bugzilla.gnome.org/>

           _______________________________________________
           orca-list mailing list
           [25]orca-list gnome org
           [26]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
           Orca wiki: [27]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
           Orca documentation: [28]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
           GNOME Universal Access guide:
           [29]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
           Log bugs and feature requests at [30]http://bugzilla.gnome.org

         _______________________________________________
         orca-list mailing list
         [31]orca-list gnome org
         [32]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
         Orca wiki: [33]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
         Orca documentation: [34]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
         GNOME Universal Access guide:
         [35]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
         Log bugs and feature requests at [36]http://bugzilla.gnome.org

 _______________________________________________
 orca-list mailing list
 [37]orca-list gnome org
 [38]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
 Orca wiki: [39]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
 Orca documentation: [40]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
 GNOME Universal Access guide: [41]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
 Log bugs and feature requests at [42]http://bugzilla.gnome.org

References

   Visible links
   1. mailto:r d t prater gmail com
   2. mailto:Fernando Botelho f123 org
   3. mailto:r d t prater gmail com
   4. mailto:pvdeejay gmail com
   5. mailto:chrys87 web de
   6. mailto:chrys87 web de
   7. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758328
   8. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758328
   9. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330508
  10. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330508
  11. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330509
  12. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330509
  13. mailto:orca-list gnome org
  14. mailto:orca-list gnome org
  15. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
  16. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
  17. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
  18. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
  19. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
  20. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
  21. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
  22. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
  23. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
  24. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
  25. mailto:orca-list gnome org
  26. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
  27. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
  28. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
  29. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
  30. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
  31. mailto:orca-list gnome org
  32. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
  33. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
  34. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
  35. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
  36. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
  37. mailto:orca-list gnome org
  38. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
  39. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
  40. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
  41. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
  42. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/



_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]