Re: [orca-list] Changes/ finetuning for Progressbar Beeps
- From: Janina Sajka <janina rednote net>
- To: "B. Henry" <burt1iband gmail com>
- Cc: orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Changes/ finetuning for Progressbar Beeps
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:18:21 -0400
4 octaves is too much, imo, if the sound is directed via the old PC
speaker.
3 is the max, imo.
It's pretty eash to test at a console:
setterm -bfreq 440
will give A in the octave beginning with middle C. 880 would give the
octave above, and 220 the octave below, and 110 the octave below that.
All other notes are decimal values in Hz.
B. Henry writes:
Who scolded you? I don't read every mail that comes to this list, but care about the topic in question and
I do not remember such messages, if they were
there then I say what is wrong with someone who complains about proposals, ideas, innovation, alternatives?
If some one did not like your idea, well they have the right and probably duty to say so, but if they
complained because you suggested something and did
the work to make it happen then they should be shot...lol
I must say that if you are saying you only use a one octave, or even two octave range for beeps from 0-100%
then I think it should be expanded, 3 or 4
octaves would be brtyter for me.
But even if I wind up not liking what you did, I thank you for doing it, just as I thank everyone who has
worked on this.
I just received a suggestion to improve something I wrote last night. I may or may not do what was
suggested, but I saw the logic in it. At the end of the
day if people feel strongly enough that they prefer the "other way" than what ever is finally kept in orca
then a patch can be made publicly available.
I just hope that folks decide to use which ever system I like best or I'm gonna stop using orca and go back
to using a votrax with ms-basic on 5.25I
floppies...lol
Regards
--
B.H.
Registerd Linux User 521886
Nolan Darilek wrote:
Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:12:56AM -0500
The patch I submitted addressed this directly by pegging the range between
middle C and the octave above, making it fairly easy to know the ranges. I
wish we could have implemented that rather than scolding me for
contributing at the time, because that may address all of these concerns
(including mine as the patch author.)
On 06/29/2016 08:57 AM, Devin Prater wrote:
I could see that working, but that’d be even more input to keep track
of. Panning beeps could be an alternative, for headphone or stereo
speaker owners, and alternate beeping could be fine for mono folks.
Sent from my Mac.
Devin Prater
[1]r d t prater gmail com
On Jun 29, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Fernando Botelho
<[2]Fernando Botelho F123 org> wrote:
I remember hearing progress beeps on NVDA and also being pretty lost,
as i did not know how high they were supposed to go.
I wish both Orca and NVDA could give just a percentage via espeak, or
if beeping is a must, then alternate between current stage and final
beep.
So if final beep were 400hz., then beep alternating 300hz 400hz, 310hz
400hz, 320hz 400hz, 330hz 400hz, and so forth.
Best,
Fernando
On 06/29/2016 10:36 AM, Devin Prater wrote:
I’d like progress beeps that pan from left to right instead of using
pitch, because most of the time I don’t know exactly how high the
pitch goes.
Sent from my Mac.
Devin Prater
[3]r d t prater gmail com
On Jun 29, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Peter Vágner [4]<pvdeejay gmail com>
wrote:
Hello,
I have looked at the issue you have linked to and I am somewhat
shocked that Nolan's patch has been put aside with somewhat
disrespectfull attitude.
To us non musicians or not very sensitive to individual tones it
might appear as something what may not be needed however I know
some people who might really benefit from having clean predictable
like implementation Nolan has suggested.
Can you Chrys and Joanie get back to that please and reconsider
it?
Greetings
Peter
On 29.06.2016 at 11:55 [5]chrys87 web de<[6]mailto:chrys87 web de>
wrote:
Hi Joanie, Hi List,
I did some finetuning on the progressbar beeps caused by
userrequests.
You could find them attached on that ticket:
[7]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758328<[8]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758328>
I made two changes:
1. make the beeps more short.
[9]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330508<[10]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330508>
2. Ignore Interval for the beeps. That only make sense for
Output that needs "time to present". People like to activate
both; Beeps for an progess gues, the voice/ braile output for
precise information in big intervals.
[11]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330509<[12]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330509>
What does others think about that here?
cheers chrys
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
[13]orca-list gnome org <[14]mailto:orca-list gnome org>
[15]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list<[16]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list>
Orca
wiki: [17]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca<[18]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca>
Orca
documentation:
[19]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/<[20]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/>
GNOME Universal Access
guide:
[21]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html<[22]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html>
Log bugs and feature requests
at [23]http://bugzilla.gnome.org<[24]http://bugzilla.gnome.org/>
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
[25]orca-list gnome org
[26]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: [27]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: [28]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
[29]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at [30]http://bugzilla.gnome.org
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
[31]orca-list gnome org
[32]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: [33]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: [34]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
[35]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at [36]http://bugzilla.gnome.org
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
[37]orca-list gnome org
[38]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: [39]https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: [40]https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide: [41]https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at [42]http://bugzilla.gnome.org
References
Visible links
1. mailto:r d t prater gmail com
2. mailto:Fernando Botelho f123 org
3. mailto:r d t prater gmail com
4. mailto:pvdeejay gmail com
5. mailto:chrys87 web de
6. mailto:chrys87 web de
7. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758328
8. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758328
9. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330508
10. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330508
11. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330509
12. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=330509
13. mailto:orca-list gnome org
14. mailto:orca-list gnome org
15. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
16. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
17. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
18. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
19. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
20. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
21. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
22. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
23. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
24. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
25. mailto:orca-list gnome org
26. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
27. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
28. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
29. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
30. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
31. mailto:orca-list gnome org
32. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
33. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
34. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
35. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
36. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
37. mailto:orca-list gnome org
38. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
39. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
40. https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
41. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
42. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
--
Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
sip:janina asterisk rednote net
Email: janina rednote net
Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]