Re: [orca-list] Most accessible IDE for java
- From: Tom Masterson <kd7cyu gmail com>
- To: Jason White <jason jasonjgw net>, orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Most accessible IDE for java
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:39:48 -0800 (PST)
To make accessibility universal there are a couple of things that need to
happen.
1. We need to make it part of the education system and start teaching
it's importance and how to do it as part of coding classes. It is not
taught and therefore not even thought of by most developers.
2. Make it easy if not almost automatic so that developers don't have to
spend extra time adding it. Especially when using an IDE it should
automatically add at least some form of accessibility items even if it is
something silly like "button" for a button but atleast get something
there. When designing a User interface adding accessibility should be
just as easy as dropping a widget on the screen and at most filling in
some extra info which should come up as part of the other stuff used for
building the widget. When you are coding on short timelines having to
think about and spend extra time adding other classes or otherwise to make
something accessible does not fall into the plans.
By adding it into the education you make it something that people will
think of and by amking it as easy as possible you make it more likely to
be used in this era when you are expected to build fully functional
sections of code in 1 to 2 weeks.
Tom
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Jason White via orca-list wrote:
José Vilmar Estácio de Souza <vilmar informal com br> wrote:
I like eclipse, but I'm disappointed with the current accessibility problems
presented in linux.
Do you mean the Eclipse problems? Perhaps telling the developers that a number
of people care about this will raise the priority of fixing those bugs.
Although more attention has been given to accessibility in recent years,
including the implementation of accessibility APIs in applications, nobody
seems to have solved the software engineering problem of bringing down the
number and severity of bugs to an acceptable level and keeping it there. There
are just too many accessibility bugs, and it doesn't seem to matter whether or
not the software is developed by a large corporation with vast rsources (as in
well known operating system and application vendors) or by smaller groups
with fewer resources.
The solution is probably a combination of technical and social changes,
including educational measures and more effective regulations.
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]