Re: [orca-list] Ubuntu Touch/phone
- From: kk <krmane gmail com>
- To: Christopher Chaltain <chaltain gmail com>, Alex Midence <alex midence gmail com>, 'kendell clark' <coffeekingms gmail com>, 'Dennis Westphal' <dennisianwestphal gmail com>
- Cc: 'Orca-list' <orca-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Ubuntu Touch/phone
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:10:46 +0530
Hi Chris,
I just had a quick check and I agree with your feedback on Android.
But I feel if some one can actually help out with some time every week
or so and start the touch accessibility on Ubuntu phone rolling, then we
will have some thing to test.
If Android could do it, the only strong point they have is human
resource for doing all the stuff including accessibility.
Orca needs this very seriously.
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
On Thursday 24 September 2015 07:25 AM, Christopher Chaltain wrote:
I can't argue with anyone's experience on Android, but I can assure
you that the experience below is not typical of Android today. We have
no idea what device or version of Android are being referred to below,
but I got a Nexus 7 in the summer of 2014 running Android 4.2 on it. I
quickly upgraded to Android 4.4 and last winter moved up to Android
5.0 followed shortly by Android 5.1.
My learning curve was comparable to that of the iPhone. I also could
use the launcher that came with the tablet as well as Chrome, the
browser, and both the Mail and Gmail apps. Google Calendar on Android
is my preferred calendar and ditto for Google Keep for notes. I've
since changed to a different launcher, email client and browser,
although I didn't have to. Android will let you change default apps,
which you can't do in IOS. Android also supports widgets, which gives
you a quicker way to get to a lot of information.
I'm not saying that Android is better than IOS. I still have an iPhone
myself, and I'm not sure if my next phone will be an Android phone or
if I'll stick with an iPhone. My only point is that you shouldn't base
your opinion of a platform on a message like the one below which is
obviously based on a platform that's changed a lot since this
unfortunate experience.
I agree Apple deserves a lot of credit for it's commitment to
accessibility. I also get the fact that someone could be loyal to
Apple for getting smart phone accessibility right before Google did. I
also agree with the point about needing to be more objective.
Although I agree accessibility is a key feature when a blind person is
considering a device, but just as sighted people consider many
different aspects of a device, features unrelated to accessibility may
be appealing to someone who might prefer Android or even Ubuntu Touch.
I know I'm willing to put up with a few accessibility short comings if
it means I get to replace my battery, use a memory card, change speech
synthesizers, use different default apps, have access to widgets and
so on. I'd be willing to put up with even more shortcomings if I could
run Ubuntu Touch and Orca on a smart phone. Of course, I'd expect
Ubuntu Touch to be working to catching up to these other platforms,
but I'd be willing to wait and help contribute to it's development.
On 09/23/2015 08:25 AM, Alex Midence wrote:
I get that you are bitter but, you need to be objective about some of
these things. Apple is respected for its accomplishments in
accessibility for good reason. The experience is stable and
intuitive. It ought to be. You pay out the nose for it. I had an
android device once. The a11y on it was so broken I couldn't even
hang up on someone when I was done with the call. The browser
experience was horrible unless you went out and got a special browser
put out by a blind products developer. Same with the e-mail. Even
then, you didn't have full functionality. Calendar? No way, totally
busted. I understand there has been some improvement since then but
I will never forget the huge letdown I experienced when I bought my
Android phone. What made it even worse is that the accessibility
solution was thought up and implemented by an actual blind
developer. And the learning curve just to use the device? Insane!
I must've spent like two days just trying to figure out how
the stup
id thing worked. Who in the world has time for such nonsense? I even
had to get a special dialer to make calls, the most basic of functions
for a phone. I had it for a few months so, I did get decently
proficient at using it but was never truly happy with it. I wound up
losing it one day which turned out to be a wonderful thing.
Enter my iPhone. I did have to get sighted assistance to turn on the
accessibility features. From there, though, I was browsing the web,
e-mailing, setting up my calendar, texting, chatting, skyping and
playing music in no time. No special browser, e-mail client or
dialer needed. You used the built-in stuff right out of the box.
The same stuff everyone else used, I used. Now, I don't know what
you mean when you say you don't like the "Apple culture" or anything
but, these people won my business fair and square. They created a
product I could use right out of the box easily, intuitively and
efficiently with a minimum of frustration. I even have a toggle
switch to turn my special software off and pass the thing to one of
my kids for them to play games on. The idea of being able to share
my technology with sighted members of my family was unheard of to me
when I was younger.
If a touch phone using Ubuntu can give that kind of experience, I'm
all for it. I think it's a long way away from it though.
My two cents,
Alex M
-----Original Message-----
From: orca-list [mailto:orca-list-bounces gnome org] On Behalf Of
kendell clark
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 6:45 AM
To: Dennis Westphal
Cc: Orca-list
Subject: Re: [orca-list] Ubuntu Touch/phone
hi
Dennis, I couldn't have said it better myself. Accessibility is a
basic right that should have been included at the start of the project.
Designed in, rather than bolted on later after enough people complain.
That being said, not even apple, which for some reason is held up as
the accessibility champion did this, so no company is perfect. Not
even linux did this, though they were fairly fast at implementing
accessibility for the text console, even if getting it going with a
hardware synth was a pita.
Thanks
Kendell clark
On 09/23/2015 06:35 AM, Dennis Westphal wrote:
Well that is real miss step in my opinion that the Ubuntu
Developers didnt include accessibility from the start of the
project. However it still is in the early stages thats why I wanted
to know if it would be possible to get orca running and make Ubuntu
Phone usible for usable for us.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 23.09.2015 um 12:08 schrieb kendell clark <coffeekingms gmail com>:
hi
Don't take me too seriously when I get like this. I'm a little bitter
when it comes to us being beneath notice. I've lived in the windows
culture for so long despite me having switched to linux 4 years ago.
Blind agencies extatically point out the advantages of whatever
platform gives them the most kickbacks, perks and endorcements, while
conveniently ignoring the other options. Companies exploit us for
profit, and make a killing at it. I watch my fellow blind people
growing up used to being gouged for basic rights people without
disabilities take for granted. Thank god for linux, and joanie, rob,
luke, everyone who make linux usable by the blind Thanks Kendell
clark
On 09/23/2015 04:41 AM, kendell clark wrote:
hi
I hate to burst your bubble, but afaik ubuntu is doing zero to make
their phone platform accessible. Android or IOS are really your only
options. Sad, but true as far as I know. This platform could be
accessible, but it takes the developers putting time and effort into
it, and as we all know, that's hard to get someone who doesn't
depend on accessibility tech to understand. What? Blind people? Huh?
I don't understand. I'm not an IOS person, mostly because I refuse
to buy into the apple culture, and also because I can't afford the
vast majority of apple hardware. I've seen what apple fans are like
and I don't really want to be caught up in that. Android fans can be
just as fanatical I suppose, but I've never had an android phone
for more than a few days.
Thanks
Kendell clark
On 09/23/2015 04:27 AM, Dennis Westphal wrote:
iOS is in my opinion the most accessible plattform for mobile
devices. However Id love to use orca and Linux in general on a
mobile Phone or Tablet as well. I myself dont really like Android.
However I could really get behind using Ubuntu Phone and that way
using Linux exclusively
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 23.09.2015 um 11:22 schrieb Vincenzo Rubano
<vincenzo rubano studio unibo it>:
From what I know, we’re really far from getting Orca running with
them. If I remember correctly, the problem should be that the a11y
infrastructure is not ready at all for handling touch screen
events…
If you want to get an accessible touch screen device I would
recommend going with an iDevice. Sure, there’s some accessibility
support in Android devices as well, but I don’t think that it is
as good as the support that iOS provides… And this is my personal
opinion after having played a bit with both platforms and I do not
intend to open up a flame…
Vincenzo.
Il giorno 23 set 2015, alle ore 09:31, Milton
<milton duurzaamdigitaal org> ha scritto:
Me too would like to have such phone.
Milton
Op 23-09-15 om 09:15 schreef Dennis Westphal:
Hi guys,
I just was wondering if there is any intension to integrate
orca in Ubuntu phone. Or if it is even possible.
If it would be possible I'd like to get my hands on one of them.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]