Re: [orca-list] New Linux user, needing higher quality speech...
- From: kk <krmane gmail com>
- To: burt1iband gmail com, Orca mail-list <orca-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] New Linux user, needing higher quality speech...
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 04:43:27 +0530
Totaly agreed, it is a matter of choice,
although I haited eloquence and voxin I think other's may love it.
By the way I am interested in that festival stuff and the voices Kile
mentioned.
How to get this working?
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
On Saturday 16 May 2015 04:32 AM, B.Henry wrote:
Kyle, I understand your point of view, but this kind of post is really
once again preaching in my opinion. Those who can and wish to go FOS
or bust are already doing so, and those who can't or won't switch away
from Voxin will not be convinced.
I personally prefer espeak by a lot for English, but people with
hearing loss issues find many synths unusable.
Also voxin works on several distros, and very popular ones out of the
box, e.g. Arch, Manjaro, Debian...
My limited experience with mbrola did not impress me so far, and
festival has been problematic for even some fairly experienced folks
to get working.
If it is important to someone to try and get people using something
other than eloquence, aka Voxin, aka viavoice... then I think making
good new voices for existing synths such as espeak will be helpful.
I've made a few, but I am not sure whether or not they will help many
people who have a hard time hearing existing espeak voices.
The bottom line is that quality is a subjective term, and although
certain aspects of quality can be objectively measured at the end of
the day we are talking about personal prefference. Saying that
eloquence is not high quality is at best a personal opinion. Again
this comes from someone who uses ESpeak.
I've seen mailing lists degenerate in to spaces doninated by "my voice
is better than yours" conversations for days on end where the clutter
of voice prefference posts makes it annoying to look for the other
content being posted.
I've sure seen more email from people who can't get festival to work
than those who have had trouble installing Voxin, and Voxin certainly
is easy to install on the distro the original poster is usiing.
B.H.
Registerd Linux User 521886
On 15/05/15 07:54 AM, Kyle wrote:
The original poster was asking about high quality voices, and mentioned
being new to modern Linux in general. Why then do people continue to
recommend something like Voxin or whatever they're calling it these
days, which is by no means a high quality voice, and is not only hard to
understand, but also hard to get installed into most distros? He said
he's having trouble hearing robotic and unclear voices, therefore, he
will need to either get tips on how to make Festival work or use the
Mbrola configuration for Espeak. Some of the Festival voices do actually
sound quite good, although nothing feels as responsive as Espeak here.
Much of the robotics of Espeak can be fixed by making variant voices,
although they have to be made as separate voices, as variant files don't
currently work with speech-dispatcher. As for festival, it should be
possible to load in the voices you want and enable a startup service
that runs
festival --server
I need to try that here, but I have heard recent reports that this does
indeed work. Best Festival voices include bdl and slt. I think these are
available in Arch using the festival-us package, but other distros have
different names for this package.
Sent from my title page
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]