Re: [orca-list] Experimental focus versus browse mode committed to master
- From: "B. Henry" <burt1iband gmail com>
- To: Peter Vágner <pvdeejay gmail com>, orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Experimental focus versus browse mode committed to master
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 14:58:37 -0500
The solution seems to be having a way to toggle the mode until it's toggled again, i.e. stickty mode , or in
other words
just toggle off the automatc switching between modes.
I do not know what triggers the mode switching. I'm no coder, but might understand given time to examine the
code in
question, don't have that time today anyway, and might be able to understand, not would understand anyway.
My point is, I can arrow upor down once, twice sometimes I think when at the very top position in the list
where the label
says something like please select. Then the mode switches back and I move to the next element, an edit box,
or maybe it's
an entry, don't remember.
My question back to you, and I'm certainly not looking for heated argument, just clear understanding and
something close
to consensus as to what's most effective before we are all finished, is:
Are you saying that a combo box is harder to work with than radio buttons?
If so, what would be the usage case or reason where one would not want to be able to continue to up and down
arrow through
all of the elements?
If there are times when thre are combo boxes where one would need to use the tab with out leaving the combo
box what are
they?
I understand that we generally want consistent behavior with arrows and tabs, but why would there even be
need for
inconsistent behavior as when one reaches the lilmites of the combo box the mode could automatically switch
whether one
arrowed all the way to the bottom or top, or if one tabs out of the element?
And if there are cases where the kind of thing I'm asking about occurs, then are they so numerous that it's
worth having
to use two or three keypresses for each move up and down a list as opposed to making the default being a
sticky mode
switch when one is in a combo box, maybe some other element types as well?
If the answer to the last one is yes, (which I can't imagine at this time, but am quite likely missing
something obvious),
then we are still back to toggling on and off of automatic mode switching. The difference would be whether
auto switching
would be on or off by default once one entered the combo ox.
If you are asking me something else, please explain and I'll try and answer.
I'll likely be off line with in an hour or so for a few hours, but will read mail again when I get home.
Regards,
--
B.H.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:26:57AM +0200, Peter Vágner wrote:
Hello,
I would like to avoid strong arguments if possible. However i think
this might really be inpossible or difficult to provide interaction
with comboboxes and other rich content from within browse mode. We
can have browse mode exceptions for some simple controls with simple
actions such as buttons, radio buttons and check boxes. Do you have
more ideas regarding your comboboxes use case? Can you post them?
Greetings
Peter
DÅa 10.8.2014 5:25 použÃvateľ "B. Henry" <[1]burt1iband gmail com>
napÃsal:
This has promise, and so far has worked pretty well.
I have not updated since sometime last night, so if the issue I
describe has been addredssed, please excuse me.
I may have missed a messae that pertains to this as the traffic's
rather heavy, and I've not gotten through all my mail;
also may have inadvertently deleted something I hadn't read.
When in a combo box it's not at all efficient to havwe to either tab
out and back in to continue down the list, or use
orca-a each time to leave browse mode.
This seems to be more or less universal, but I've not tested on many
sites. Mostly I'm experiencing this on the
[2]callcentric.com site, but you'd need an account to see it as I've
been configuring a new account in the user porthole
pages.
This kind of control needs to stay in the focus mode untilone
manually leaves it to have a practical user experience.
Some pages seem to be quite a bit more responsive when navigating
down with arrows now, and although I sure don't like all
those extra keystroikes the mode changes were happening as fast as I
was typing, so for sure you are on to something here.
Regards,
--
B.H.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 04:40:17PM -0400, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> Hey guys.
>
> Based on the feedback received, I have just committed the
following
> changes to master:
>
> * Orca will automatically switch between "focus mode" and "browse
mode"
>
> * Orca will announce "focus mode" or "browse mode" when it does
this
> Â for you. It is currently at the end of the presentation of the
new
> Â location. That way, if you know what the deal is (of course it
is in
> Â focus mode now), you don't have to listen to Orca tell you. You
can
> Â just keep browsing or interacting with the widget.
>
> * The current keybinding is Orca + A. This will toggle between the
two
> Â modes. I chose this because we needed something for you to
test. And
> Â it was the only suggestion I saw proposed by y'all which didn't
> Â conflict with existing bindings or result in complaints from
someone
> Â else. If y'all don't like Orca + A, propose something we all
can live
> Â with or rebind it to something you can live with.
>
> * All the non-perfomant and non-reliable logic about whether or
not Orca
> Â should really control things is ripped out. Arrowing seems a
bit more
> Â peppy to me now. I hope you find the same.
>
> What I have not committed/done yet:
> * Playing tones. That's a nice to have. We can add it later.
> * Documentation. We don't know what the final feature will look
like.
> * Settings. Orca does it automatically. It's easy to toggle off.
>
> What would be extremely helpful is testing from you to see what
you all
> think. What is totally broken, what must be changed, etc. In the
> meantime, I'll see what I can do about the looping, etc.
>
> Thanks!
> --joanie
> _______________________________________________
> orca-list mailing list
> [3]orca-list gnome org
> [4]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Visit [5]http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
> The manual is at
[6]http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.h
tml
> The FAQ is at
[7]http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
> Log bugs and feature requests at [8]http://bugzilla.gnome.org
> Find out how to help at [9]http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
[10]orca-list gnome org
[11]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit [12]http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
[13]http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.
html
The FAQ is at
[14]http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at [15]http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at [16]http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
References
1. mailto:burt1iband gmail com
2. http://callcentric.com/
3. mailto:orca-list gnome org
4. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
5. http://live.gnome.org/Orca
6. http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
7. http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
8. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
9. http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
10. mailto:orca-list gnome org
11. https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
12. http://live.gnome.org/Orca
13. http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
14. http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
15. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
16. http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]