[orca-list] keybindings philosophy__was: Experimental focus versus browse mode committed to master
- From: "B. Henry" <burt1iband gmail com>
- To: Jason White <jason jasonjgw net>, orca-list gnome org
- Subject: [orca-list] keybindings philosophy__was: Experimental focus versus browse mode committed to master
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 11:33:06 -0500
Good point, and while I['ve never had the chance to try a Mac to see how VO does its thing, I get the point.
Another example worth looking at, and major source of potential conflicts is chromoe/chromevox.
I've had to remap my desktop keybindings to avoid conflicts with chromevox because at times the option to
change chromevox
modifier key(s) has been disabled, and at other times, usually it's at least partially broken.
For those who've never tried chromevox by default it uses control alt on Linux, and I think shift alt on
windows as
default chromevox modifier. Gnome, XFCE, and Unity at least use control alt, so after spending hours
experimenting with
partially broken chromevox keybindings I found it best and easiest to leave chromevox modifier alone and
change all
control alt keybindings in my desktops to super alt. BTW, (and OT), I use control super when I run out of
logical super
alt options, and use all three keys for both those times where I need a letter that is already being used a
couple of
times, and for some personalized commands that would not be transferrible to most other systems.
My point is that there's a lot of potential conflict out there. Chromevox by default has a lot of emacish two
character
keybindings, and I don't like these, and will be experimenting again with the more traditional "flat keymap"
available for
chromevox, but there are more potential conflicts there. If we'd only been born with six or seven fingers and
had a 35-40
letter alphabet...lol.
Apart from the orca modifier, control is the only option that can be more or less comfortably used in
combination with
ordcakeys for keybiindings. The other posibility is shift, but unless I'm mistaken it doesn't work, or at
least doesn't
work reliably, e.g. does orca a consistently perform differently than orca shift a? I don't remember for sure
the results
of my experiments, but thinkat best shift only made a distinct binding sometimes.
I was looking at ratpoison, but dropped it from my possible defualt GUIs quickly because of the emacs style
bindings, and
don't use screen as much as I might because again, two letter combinations take some getting used to, and
although I'm a
fairly flexible thinker/computer user I've not adapted well to two letter bindings, just do not flow in a
good rhythm of
typing for me, and especially should be avoided when possible for screenreader controls.
Could two letter bindings be used for those who want them though, or can they now?
Thanks again for the time and energy put in to this experiment and likely major improvement to Orca!
--
B.H.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 04:44:10PM +1000, Jason White wrote:
I suspect we're about to see a re-run of the Vi vs. Emacs debate with respect
to keyboard usage.
Vi makes wonderful use of the keyboard at the expense of having two modes:
command mode and insert mode.
Emacs avoids the modes, but takes your fingers to awkward key combinations.
Likewise, OS X avoids having distinct modes, at the expense of requiring you
to hold down modifier keys while moving the focus (except where the
application's handling of tab and arrow keys does what is needed).
The problem with Orca and Gecko here, as I understand it, is that Orca takes
over caret navigation, but uses the same keys (i.e., cursor movement keys)
that are also used to interact with widgets. It's a key conflict problem that
could be solved if Orca mapped its caret navigation commands to something
other than arrow keys and tab.
At this point we would have arguments on both sides about which design is
better and whether we should avoid having browse and focus modes or not.
I think it would be best to make some design decisions about the future and
then change the implementation accordingly. I don't have strong views on the
issues at stake, although, having used OS X recently, I quite like the fact
that none of the screen reader commands conflicts with keys commonly used in
applications. At the same time, this does lead to some awkward key
combinations.
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]