Re: [orca-list] Structural HTML navigation by lists

[Marcus Habermehl <bmh1980de yahoo de>]

Am 20.01.2011 07:51, schrieb Steve Holmes:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:38:47PM +1100, Jason White wrote:
> > Joanmarie Diggs <joanied gnome org> wrote:
> > > > What is your opinion on the object types and the shortcuts?
> > >
> > > The original plan was to make all structural navigation objects
> > > accessible via a list, and also make the presentation similar so
> > > that what a user found when navigating amongst objects (especially
> > > form fields and their labels) matched with what was found in the
> > > lists. It sounds like your solution may be different. Whether or not
> > > that matters is something I'll leave open for discussion.
> >
> > I like the idea of Joanie's solution as described above.
> >
> > As for the key bindings, it might be best to have a prefix key which accesses
> > the list options, followed by a mnemonic key (the same as that used in
> > structural navigation, by default) to choose the type of list.
> >
> > Thus, for example, suppose we used shift-ctrl-l as the prefix, the list of
> > headings would be shift-ctrl-l h.
> >
> > the shift-ctrl-l is just an example, not a proposal.
>
> Yes, I think I prefer this approach too.  The original proposal would
> gobble up at least 7 valuable keys in one shot.  I for one, don't use
> lists much so would rather have those keys available for other future
> uses.  Of course, others may want these lists but that's where
> Joanie's idea appears more appropriate to me.

Now I am a bit confused. joanie, we are talking of different lists, or a
single list, as it is in my patch with Orca+Ctrl+F8?

Greetings
Marcus