Re: [orca-list] miscellaneous Orca comments



Oh, yep! And don't forget all those modules for cards we don't have, ore, heck, let's get rid of all those pesky modules that we just don't know what they're for or might make us nervous. What a great idea, for someone, I guess.


--
Bill in Denver

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Rich Caloggero wrote:

In any case, integrating Speakup into a distribution should not be a
distribution level task. It needs to just be there--in the kernel that
each distro starts with.

I agree. I also think that people might be nervous about extra stuff in the
kernel.  To this end, perhaps an option to remove it,  in initial
installation / configuration?

-- Rich


----- Original Message -----
From: "Janina Sajka" <janina rednote net>
To: "Alex Snow" <lists h14me homelinux net>
Cc: <orca-list gnome org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [orca-list] miscellaneous Orca comments


Alex Snow writes:
...  If speakup could be stabalized to work across many kernel
versions then it would have less of a chance of being dropped by a
particular distro.  On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:43:38AM +0100, Hermann
wrote:
Or, if the kernel can settle on how they now want to handle serial
interfaces, etc., Speakup would just work across kernel versions as it
has in the past when its interfaces were not being actively rewritten.

In any case, integrating Speakup into a distribution should not be a
distribution level task. It needs to just be there--in the kernel that
each distro starts with.

Janina

_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca


_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]