Re: [orca-list] Compiling Gnome



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Well, that's another twist:).  Actually from what I had previously
gathered, I always thought at-spi had depended on atk for low level
stuff but what do I know? I never was sure where gail fit in the
loop.  I really wish these README files the developers assemble would
show the proper list of dependencies.  Frankly, the at-spi files are
worse.  the README says nothing about compilation order and the
INSTALL file is too generic to offer any real substance.

I guess the config files are a good definitive source as any though;
especially since they drive what gets compiled and when.

One thing we can probally all agree on is that Orca should be compiled
last. <smile>

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:16:58AM -0500, Willie Walker wrote:
Steve:

Oh dear. I think I've had the wrong mental model of all of this and now 
I'm very confused.  I scouring the configure.in files for atk, gail, and 
at-spi, I think I'm seeing the following order:

at-spi depends upon gail depends upon atk

Will

Steve Holmes wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

This is where the conflict begins.  I'm hearing two conflicting orders
here.  Last week, I had a mess of my system because things were
somehow compiled/built in the wrong order or something; I had all
kinds of problems with Orca.  I followed once sequence later on and
managed to get things right and the gnome and orca worked fine.  I
then heard Willie's suggested order so rebuilt the stuff along with
the updates from svn and things still work OK but there must be a
defined order hear due to the dependencies in place.  I think the only
time it wouldn't matter much is if they were all stand-alone packages
using shared libraries loaded dynamically.  But if any of them use
stuff from another installed package that's already installed, then
this order is important.  I originally thought the order was more like
yours specified here but am not really sure now.  The README files
don't mention these packages specifically so it is not obvious.

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:35:31AM +0100, Bohdan R. Rau wrote:
Dnia 28-01-2008, pon o godzinie 08:45 -0500, Willie Walker pisze:
[...]
1) The AT-SPI defines the overall API and provides the overall support 
for the infrastructure, so at-spi need to be built first.

From at-spi.spec (old 1.20 version):

BuildRequires:  atk-devel >= 1:1.20.0
BuildRequires:  gail-devel >= 1.20.0

So I think at-spi should be built after gail and atk.

Bohdan


_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca

- -- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://holmesgrown.ld.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHobnHWSjv55S0LfERAypTAJ4tF4+TxfY52BiITBwc4nk4KAsJkwCgtR37
qYaDU2ccQpb0Quiu1Wc0+t8=
=insc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca


- -- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://holmesgrown.ld.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHofSuWSjv55S0LfERAwZdAJ9m316jKasuFp71841Dux0B6WrlUgCbBzo8
mhtYJlv1kVKmbecL8/OwTuw=
=m7Mb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]