Re: orbit-io-thread ?
- From: Jules Colding <colding omesc com>
- To: Michael Meeks <mmeeks novell com>
- Cc: ORBit2 <orbit-list gnome org>, "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>
- Subject: Re: orbit-io-thread ?
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:32:21 +0100
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 09:34 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Jules,
> On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 19:38 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> > > The spec explicitly allows for vendors to add their own "magical
> > > strings", so we're doing nothing wrong here.
> > That is correct, we are doing nothing wrong spec-wise. It is just, IMHO,
> > not good taste to attach any special meaning to substrings in the ORB
> > name.
> Heh ;-) quite possibly not - but it's the only sensible way to do this.
> Also - AFAIK there is no particular need to set 'link_set_thread_io
> (TRUE)' in the ORB init; ultimately (AFAIR) as soon as you create a
> thread-aware POA then it does this for you anyway [ of course, it's
> prolly not wise to do that from some random thread but ... ].
True: orbit-adaptor.c line 29. Didn't see that one...
Are there any reason to keep the magical string if the POA thread hint
takes care of this?
I would *really* love to shoot it ;-)
] [Thread Prev