Re: orbit-io-thread ?
- From: Michael Meeks <mmeeks novell com>
- To: Jules Colding <colding omesc com>
- Cc: ORBit2 <orbit-list gnome org>, "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>
- Subject: Re: orbit-io-thread ?
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:34:00 +0000
Hi Jules,
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 19:38 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> > The spec explicitly allows for vendors to add their own "magical
> > strings", so we're doing nothing wrong here.
>
> That is correct, we are doing nothing wrong spec-wise. It is just, IMHO,
> not good taste to attach any special meaning to substrings in the ORB
> name.
Heh ;-) quite possibly not - but it's the only sensible way to do this.
Also - AFAIK there is no particular need to set 'link_set_thread_io
(TRUE)' in the ORB init; ultimately (AFAIR) as soon as you create a
thread-aware POA then it does this for you anyway [ of course, it's
prolly not wise to do that from some random thread but ... ].
Anyhow - it's not pleasant, but it looks like the only/best way to do
this to me.
Regards,
Michael.
--
michael meeks novell com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]