Re: GEP / C++ bindings ...

Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 21:57, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > I assume we're all trying to figure out how to merge the C++ bindings
> > for Orbit2 into the mainline, right?
>         Whether they should be merged into the main ORBit2 package, or shipped
> separately.
> > Or are some people arguing that the C++ bindings should be left as
> > an optional patch?  Or abandoned?
>         Not abandoned, most certainly not, nor a patch. There are 2
> possibilities - an optional compile in ORBit2, or a separate package
> depending on ORBit2.

Any of those should be fine, as long as the result works well
and there is nothing that would cause Garnome, Ximian, and Red Hat to
not include the shared runtime part of the bindings by default.
- Dan

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]