Re: GEP / C++ bindings ...

[Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>]

On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 17:28, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >   2. It would require ORBit/C++ to reimplement lots of
> > currently-undocumented low-level code. That would be a wasteful
> > duplication of code and effort. And I know it's beyond my abilities.
> 
> 	Well; how much is there; in fact I think Gergo has done rather a good
> job of keeping this code out of sight and down in volume - isn't that so
> Gergo ?

It isn't an issue of the code that we've added. It's about the private C
code that we've used. I'm not confident that you will want to, or be
allowed to, break ORBit2 up into smaller libraries at this stage. I
guess you could just move some functions into other header files and
install those headers, and maybe reorganise the ORBit2 build structure
to reflect their change. But isn't that kind of change both risky and
API-breaking? 

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc@usa.net
www.murrayc.com