Re: Changing primary plugin on Fedora to keyfile

[Thomas Haller <thaller redhat com>]

On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 22:09 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi Dusty,
>
> Am Di., 23. Juni 2020 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Dusty Mabe <
> dusty dustymabe com>:
> > On 5/13/20 9:19 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > > On 5/10/20 2:50 AM, Thomas Haller wrote:
> > > > But it's mainly the choice of downstream/Fedora. I think this
> > > > would
> > > > require a Changes document ([1]) and discussion on fedora
> > > > devel.
> > > >
> > > > [1] 
> > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/changes_policy/
> > > >
> > > > Seems the deadline for F33 is in June ([2])
> > > >
> > > > [2] 
> > > > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-all-tasks.html
> > >
> > > Yes! The correct way to go about this would be to file a changes
> > > request and have
> > > a discussion. I would love for that to happen. Would the NM team
> > > be interested in
> > > doing that?
> >
> > Hey Thomas,
> >
> > Did we ever file this change request? I think the deadline is
> > coming up.
>
> the current plan is to file it on Monday (deadline is one day later).
> If you can/want to prepare a draft beforehand, I guess Thomas would
> not mind.


Hi,

Here there is the first draft of the Change:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NetworkManager_keyfile_instead_of_ifcfg_rh

If you have feedback, please via email in this thread or simply edit
the wiki page.

I plan to publish it on Monday (29 June).


Thanks, best,
Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part