On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 09:28 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 13:30 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 07:32 -0400, Pavel Simerda wrote:----- Original Message ----- What about my original suggestion of "onboot" as a separate option from "auto"[1] plus a new behavior that "onboot" connections would be enforced even if the device is already configured? [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700651ah right. that was it.ISTR the issue with that would be how to not break existing behavior that assumes that onboot is TRUE.
which existing behavior do you mean?
Plus the original onboot stuff was about blocking startup, not forcefully starting the connection?
yes it was. but IMO it's related: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700651#c23 Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part