Kay Sievers schrieb: > On 8/14/07, Michael Biebl <biebl debian org> wrote: >> Dan Williams schrieb: >>> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 01:19 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Shouldn't this be /usr/libexec though? I thought that's where that sort >>> of thing went. Do you think /usr/libexec/nm-dhcp-client.action would be >>> OK? >> Yep, $libexecdir would be fine for that case. > > Nope, it should be /usr/lib/NetworkManager/. Libexec is mainly a Red > Hat construct that disagrees with LSB: > "Applications may use a single subdirectory under /usr/lib. If an > application uses a subdirectory, all architecture-dependent data > exclusively used by the application must be placed within that > subdirectory." > > So no new stuff should use any libexec thing. It's ok though, as long > as the libexec dir is configurable, but it will be a pain for addons > to find out the right place to install stuff. > $libexecdir as defined by autoconf is not necessarily equal to /usr/libexec. In Debian the policy is, to use $(libdir)/packagename for $libexecdir. Using $libexecdir gives every distro the possibility to choose what they seems fits best. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature