Re: Icon label visibility diff...
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Gene Ragan <diskzero mac com>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org, Hans Petter Jansson <hpj novell com>
- Subject: Re: Icon label visibility diff...
- Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:24:47 +0100
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:23 -0800, Gene Ragan wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2006, at 1:09 PM, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 00:30 -0800, Gene Z. Ragan wrote:
> >
> >> less.png shows is a nice way to visually clean up the clutter. If
> >> the
> >> background in white or a solid color, the label selection frame is
> >> done
> >> using that color with an opacity value. If the background is a
> >> bitmap,
> >> nothing is done. In the bitmap case, it would probably be
> >> possible to
> >> sample the background image at the location, but it seemed like a
> >> lot of
> >> work.
> >>
> >> What do you thing? Please take a look at the attacked diff. It has
> >> been a while since I have coded to the nautilus guidelines and I have
> >> made some obvious mistakes.
> >
> > It's a good idea, but the result looks like a rendering bug :)
> >
> > Maybe it'll look better if you make the selection frames completely
> > opaque? The faint text is pretty much unreadable anyway.
Yeah, i think it will have to be some form of feathered gradient. The
very sharp rectangular corners where some text/icon is partially
overlapped looks very strange.
Seems like a fun thing to do with cairo. Also, if you want to do that
you should probably take a look at doing
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380060 at the same time, since
they are quite related.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
He's a short-sighted alcoholic dog-catcher searching for his wife's true
killer. She's a virginal impetuous opera singer with a flame-thrower. They
fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]