Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus user testing at MIT
- From: Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas Mailhot email enst fr>
- To: Miles Lane <miles megapathdsl net>
- Cc: nautilus-list lists eazel com, gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus user testing at MIT
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 00:14:31 +0100
Le jeu, 04 jan 2001 23:43:57, Miles Lane a écrit :
> Anyhow, yes, I agree that the UI should remain fully
> usable
> while the cursor displays the hourglass.
Wich isn't the case ; an hourglass is a difficult pointer.
> Again, the reason I like the hourglass is just that it is
> a *known* mechanism for informing the huge base of Windoze
> users that the OS is launching your application. Why have
> we got to reinvent the wheel?
Because the window wheel is square, that's why.
Using cursor forms to inform a user of its applications
state don't work, because there is *one* mouse pointer and
*lots* of app windows. Web browser designers recognized this
and created throbbers for this very reason.
Now if you want to add more application state feedback in a
generic way in a *real* multitasking environment, where apps
can be constrained by different ressources :
1. define standard states
2. create a throbber form for all of them
3. embed your throbber in a generic place (title bar, task
list, dock, splash screen, start monitor-applet, whatever)
Et voilà, you've got a generic app-state feedback mechanism
using a known solution wich does not suffer from
mouse-pointer-hourglass limits.
--
Nicolas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]