Re: GNOME Board of Directors Foundation Elections Spring 2009 - Preliminary results
- From: Dave Neary <dneary gnome org>
- To: Stormy Peters <stormy peters gmail com>
- Cc: foundation-list <foundation-list gnome org>, Dan Winship <danw gnome org>, michael meeks novell com, john palmieri <john j5 palmieri gmail com>, GNOME Foundation Membership Committee <membership-committee gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME Board of Directors Foundation Elections Spring 2009 - Preliminary results
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:58:46 +0200
Hi,
Stormy Peters wrote:
I too think the election committee should just decide.
(From board discussions, I'm pretty confident they wanted to do it
however Maemo does it, but at this point I think the election committee
should decide.)
I'd replace "decide" with "clarify" here - it's clear there was an
intention, and now we're in something of a niche situation, where we
just need a clarification from the committee what method they intended
to use - then we just count with that.
I prefer fractional transfer because its results are deterministic, they
will not be different if you run the election 10 different times. That
isn't true of random transfer (which is a real world compromise to make
hand-counting big elections feasible). But if that's not what the
election committee intended, then so be it, we'll count it the other
way, organise a hand check, and be done with it.
Having counted the election by hand yesterday, I can tell you that the
hand count will come down to a 1 or 2 vote difference between Sri and
Jorge for the last seat, and Vincent, Behdad, German, Brian and Diego
will be elected.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
GNOME Foundation member
dneary gnome org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]