Re: smbfs: questions and issues
- From: Toby <etatoby gmail com>
- To: wwp <subscript free fr>
- Cc: mc gnome org
- Subject: Re: smbfs: questions and issues
- Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 09:30:30 +0200
I re-discover smbfs after few years, I see it's still as slow and
itchy as it was
Yes, the performance and bugginess of Samba / smbfs have not been improving at all. Which is probably not the
developers' fault, but a poorly designed protocol.
If your setup allows it, you might want to try sshfs. Coming from smbfs, I've found it to be ridiculously
fast and reliable.
There is also mc's internal #sh support:
cd #sh:user server:/path
You might want to try both (FUSE sshfs and mc #sh) and see which one works best for you. I tend to use sshfs
for local resources, as a replacement for smbfs or nfs, and #sh for remote resources.
Toby
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]