Re: Mc-devel Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5
- From: Slava Zanko <slavazanko gmail com>
- To: mc-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: Mc-devel Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:10:26 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
06.01.2010 23:33, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Even if I repeat myself now: my plan is to replace mc-internal
> vfs my mvfs in the long run. Of course, there's still a lot to do,
> mainly port existing vfs'es to mvfs. As smb is planned to be
> reimplemented ontop recent libsmb, this would be an ideal starting
> point. Once done, adding it to (mvfs-based) MC will take about 5mins.
Enrico, feel free to create branch with your mvfs subsystem (but need a
clean precise code, without any "little refactoring" or indentation of
existing files).
As I understand, mvfs completelly incompatible with present VFS.
Therefore need to add option '--with-vfs=<mcvfs|mvfs>' into ./configure
script. Default must be traditional VFS.
Also, keep in mind that in near future some directories, such as
$(srcdir)/vfs and $(srcdir)/edit will moved into $(srcdir)/src subdir
(for example, $(srcdir)/src/vfs and $(srcdir)/src/edit). This is a part
of old-time plan by reorganization directory structure.
Therefore (IMHO) better way for now: need to resolve ticket
http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/1866 as fast. Then you may add
your library into $(srcdir)/src/mvfs.
Is this good idea?
- --
WBR, Slavaz.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAktFCkwACgkQb3oGR6aVLpoWiQCeJm3ExgYfzpA55FeqDd8n0v4H
9Z8An0ebvFRq7cmBRMpATzGARNGkPn4y
=rRvq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]