Re: Mc-devel Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5

* Yury V. Zaytsev <yury shurup com> schrieb:


> My personal issue with mvfs is that it's basically an unsupported
> project. 

libmvfs is actively maintained by me (and I dont see any reason for
abandoning it ever). As it's vital to several of my customer projects,
I'll always maintain it.

> Your signature is not up to date, there's no mention of mvfs

This is a special signature for certain maillist ... i'm just too 
lazy to update it ;-o

> Let's assume that the patch gets into mc pretty soon. Last time you
> disappeared for half a year or something like that. 

Just look at the archives to find out *why* I was gone. Actually,
I dont want to warm up that issue again and again, instead concentrate
on progress and maintain my own non-glib-branch.

> Who's gonna support this pretty crucial piece of functionality then? 

Anyone can fork anytime.

 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service -
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]