Re: Ubuntu GNOME Flavor naming
- From: Ryan Lortie <desrt desrt ca>
- To: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha ubuntu com>
- Cc: Robert Ancell <robert ancell ubuntu com>, licensing gnome org, marketing-list gnome org, Sebastien Bacher <seb128 ubuntu com>, board gnome org
- Subject: Re: Ubuntu GNOME Flavor naming
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:28:33 -0400
hi,
On 12-08-20 12:36 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
1. GNOMEbuntu
2. Ubuntu GNOME Edition
3. GNObuntu
Ryan has already registered http://gnomebuntu.org/ so I'm leaning
towards the first name if that's acceptable.
The reason I like the first name (at least in some form) is because if I
ask someone "what distro?" they will not reply with "Ubuntu GNOME
Edition". It's going to get nick-named "gubuntu" or something like that
in casual usage. Having an official nickname like "gnomebuntu" is
important if we want to avoid this. The idea is that this could be used
in the domain name and metapackage/seed names while reserving the longer
name for official marketing/branding materials (website titles, splash
screens, etc).
I have less of an opinion about what the "official" name should be. A
name like "Ubuntu GNOME Edition" or even "GNOME, powered by Ubuntu" were
discussed at the UDS and I think they're okay. I registered the domain
at the time, though, because I was pretty sure that even if we pick one
of these names we would require a shorter nickname, and imho,
"gnomebuntu" is the only one I consider acceptable (rejecting explicit
names like "gnubuntu" "gnobuntu" "gubuntu", etc).
Consider http://ubuntugnomeedition.org/ and you start to see what I mean...
Cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]