On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
For heaven's sake, _please_ leave me out of your "how can we keep the little people from being so gosh-darned disruptive?"-fest. If you'd like to discuss an essentially chronic passive-aggressive situation where messages espousing the "free software movement"-approved terminology from Mr. Stallman (messages which everyone privately admits are disruptive, but suggests should simply be universally ignored, because, "well, that's just _Richard_") are somehow just fine, but messages suggesting that people actually take the time to critically examine that position must be banned, I'm certainly game. If that's not what you're after, than perhaps you'd best try another tack to support your position. Feel free to moderate me here, as well, for insufficient zeal—thereby essentially demonstrating my point for me—but if you feel impelled to do so, at least do me the courtesy of leaving me out of your ill-considered examples in the future. Thanks for your ongoing consideration. |