Re: GNOME 2.20 release notes
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: GNOME Marketing List <marketing-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.20 release notes
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:59:44 +0200
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:35 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:56 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 10:46 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 11:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 16:48 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > > > Here is my first attempt at putting everything on one page (with the
> > > > > content from 2.14):
> > > > > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.20/notes/en/
> > [snip]
> > > Like last year, I'll go ahead and plug gnome-doc-utils. This is
> > > the output of 'gnome-doc-tool html -d2 release-notes.xml':
> > >
> > > http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/notes2-20/index.html
> >
> > That does look pretty good, though we'd still like to get it all on one
> > page somehow, instead of breaking across pages. Is there any easy option
> > for that?
> >
> > And it would be nice to lose the empty "About This Document" page and
> > link. Maybe I just need to remove the <abstract> section?
> >
> > Also, we'll need to add the www.gnome.org header and footer that we have
> > now:
> > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.20/notes/en/
>
> The structure of the document looks like this:
>
> article
> sect1
> sect2
> sect2
> sect2
> ...
> appendix
That was to get it all on one page with the old .xsl.
>
> Why not just structure it like this:
>
> article
> sect1
> sect1
> sect1
> ...
> appendix
This is how it was before, which I preferred.
> It would make things much easier, I think.
That would be fine.
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]