Re: The relation with gnomefiles.org

["Eugenia Loli-Queru" <eloli hotmail com>]

> At this point, I suggest a "high-level" cooperation of the two sites.
> Lets start by aligning policies and appearance. We can go for tighter
> integration after our first relaunch.
> This is probably necessary to "blend in" with the other gnome sites.

I don't have any plans to change the CMS/looks or URLs of gnomefiles. It 
works very well as it is now (and with full mobile support), so I really 
don't want to change that. What I can do to blend in with the OSS community 
is to make more clear which apps are not OSS, to remove the ads and add your 
gnome-news feed.

I mean, I only need an XML feed from you guys, there's no reason to 
re-invent the wheel and go deep into work just for an RSS feed. ;)

> I guess first we have to come up with some policy about what is
free/commercial/proprietary,

What I am going to do is simplify the non-Free apps to *only two* categories 
(that will show up in red and italics):
- Free to use, but not open source
- Commercial demo, but not open source
All the rest of the licenses that will show on gnomefiles will be OSS 
licenses, and so they won't be in red. This is the best way I can do it 
without screwing up with 1500 apps in the DB and changing them by hand.

Eugenia