Re: wgo revamp timeline (proposal)
- From: "AMAZIGH Aneglus" <aneglus gmail com>
- To: marketing-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: wgo revamp timeline (proposal)
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:38:27 +0200
... and the i18n module still appears to be a patch,
Are you talking about this http://drupal.org/project/i18n ?!
as well as terribly inefficient in terms of database access and design.
Don't know about this
I really don't think it has a good answer to content translation at this point.
The question is who has the best answer -- now -- not what is the best
answer to our problems. Because the best answer to our problems would
be (almost every time) to build our own framework but I don't think
that there is enough hands but why not, if we target to build the
next-gen desktop we could start with a new project which will take
into account this new ideas and write from scratch.
We can't avoid Drupal because the i18n isn't completely mature. If the
counter proposition is a wiki, it can be done with drupal.
I guess that Mozilla.org use drupal with the mediawiki module.
] [Thread Prev