Re: [libxml++] 2.8.0 needed

["Murray Cumming" <murrayc murrayc com>]

And if they really want to static link then they can talk to the libxml++
developers about giving us some cash for a special license. I don't think
that's necessary for libxml because it has an MIT license.

> What do you doubt? If people statically link to a LGPL app then they must
> provide source code (on request, and they must make it clear they they may
> request it) to anyone to whom they provide object files. The purpose of
> the LGPL is to allow dynamic linking of libraries. For static linking,
> it's the same as the GPL.

Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com