RE: [libxml++] sax_parser example: entity not defined

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

Dan Dennedy wrote:
> I just posted a revised 
> patch that embeds this handling inside SaxParser proper. 
> Note, it uses an empty dummy Document to perform its magic. 

I am very close to being able to check this in, but I would like some
response to these questions:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=829721&group_id=129
99&atid=312999

In particular, I am concerned that we must always use true in the
constructor, or normal entity substitution is broken. I would be surprised
if we always had to use this dummy document just to get normal entity
substitution.

This is really cool, and I really want to get it checked in.

Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net