Re: [libxml++] unicode support

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 17:44, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> > Well a patch would be much more helpful, but still you haven't even
> > shown us this "code". This is dull.
> 
> Hey, not so hasty. I'v done the changes at work, and don't have access
> to it over the weekend. I sure can put it online somewhere or send
> it to sf.net on monday.
> 
> As I said, being required to send it in as a patch (and then debate
> at great length all details) would just stop me from using it, which
> is why I run my own version. If we manage to merge the stuff in,
> all the better. But neither you nor me depend on it. Sounds fair ?

a) All this talk is a waste of time until you actually have something
for us to look at and respond to.
b) Sooner or later it would have to be a patch.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com