Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] Status

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:16, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> >>After Stefan remark concerning it's patch, I think I'm goind to branch before 
> >>the initial patch commit.
> > 
> > 
> > Which remark?
> 
> My point was that, while lacking a lot of features, libxml++ before my
> initial patch was consistent in the way it worked. My patch changed the 
> perspective of what an xmlpp::Node actually is (for example),

No patch should introduce regressions. 

Could you explain more? I thought you just changed the implementation
without changing the API?


> all we need to do is branch from the version just before the patch, and 
> declare that branch to be the 'stable 1.0' branch. No need to reapply
> anything.

I liked your patch.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com