Re: [guadec-list] List of approved sessions

[David Neary <dneary free fr>]

Hi,

Anne �tergaard wrote:
> l�6 05 2006 kl. 16:33 +0200, skrev David Neary:
> 
> http://live.gnome.org/GUADEC2006/Contents
> 
>>From this list I can se that my panel debate at GUADEC on the main
> conclusions from the EU report (soon to be officially published) on why
> there is only 1� % women actively involved in free software is
> "unsure". 

"Unsure" referred to its day/track - late sessions were tagged on to
this page after Quim did the initial sorting. All of the sessions on the
page were not guaranteed representation in the schedule, as noted right
up top, and indeed, the session that you proposed was not among the
sessions we accepted.

This page will be replaced by the final draft schedule shortly.

> I was my intent to try to make a suggestion policy for GNOME to change
> this unfortunate and unfriendly situation by getting a policy.
> 
> I am going to prepare my presentation any way.

Please do. I reccommend that you ask to make a lightning presentation to
present your main ideas, followed by a BOF during after hours, or at a
time period when you think you will get a good number of people during
the core, and bring up your ideas.

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
Dave Neary
bolsh gimp org
Lyon, France