Re: Shall we wrap the gesture API in gtkmm? And GtkLockButton?

["Juan R. Garcia Blanco" <juanrgar gmail com>]

Hi,

I think I prefer working on GtkLockButton+GPermission for now. For these
I'll file a bug for you all to review the code. Thank you.

Best regards,
Juan.

On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 09:47 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
> I've started working on all of the gesture API. Most of these classes
> are very small.
>
> If you want to share the work with me, it would be great if you could
> make some code that uses this API. The gtk+ gesture classes are used
> in gtk+/demos/gtk-demo/gestures.c and gtk+/testsuite/gtk/gestures.c.
> The demos file is probably a good starting point.
> I realize that you can't finish such a job before I've pushed the
> Gtk::Gesture classes. Perhaps I can do that late today. If not, within
> the next few days.
>
> I have not started wrapping GtkLockButton. I'm not sure I'll do it, at
> least not soon. If you want to do it, go ahead.
>
> Kjell
>
> 2014-06-28 11:58, Juan Rafael García Blanco skrev:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I could work on some of them. Have you started working  on any? Do you have a split proposal?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Juan.
> >
> >
> > On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:08, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 17:19 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
> > > > There are many new gesture classes in gtk+ 3.13.2. Shall we wrap them
> > > > in gtkmm? Now or later?
> > > > Gtk+'s NEWS file says "The gesture-related APIs are still subject to
> > > > change."
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > I guess they will become stable when this verision of GTK+ becomes
> > > stable, so it would be great to start wrapping them now. Thanks
> > > > There is also the GtkLockButton class from gtk+ 3.2, which is not
> > > > wrapped yet. It requires GPermission (gio), which is also not wrapped
> > > > yet. GPermission is an abstract base class. The only subclass I've
> > > > found is GSimplePermission.
> > > >
> > > > I can wrap some of these classes, but I doubt that I will wrap all of
> > > > them. Is anyone interested in C++ versions?
> > > It sounds less useful, but it would be nice to have.