Re: Clarification for the application of GVariant/Glib::Variant maybe types
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Markus Elfring <Markus Elfring web de>
- Cc: José Alburquerque <jaalburquerque gmail com>, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Clarification for the application of GVariant/Glib::Variant maybe types
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:07:41 +0200
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 23:20 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Note that GVariant generally doesn't have set functions. It's meant to
> > be an invariant type.
>
> This C API corresponds to the immutable object interface category then.
Yes, I meant "immutable". You are verbose.
> > That probably makes it unsuitable for general use anyway.
>
> I guess that your class "Glib::Variant" makes it more convenient to work with
> them. Does it support to reset such a C++ variable to an instance which will be
> marked as "nothing"?
No.
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
