Re: Clarification for the application of GVariant/Glib::Variant maybe types



On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 23:20 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Note that GVariant generally doesn't have set functions. It's meant to
> > be an invariant type.
> 
> This C API corresponds to the immutable object interface category then.

Yes, I meant "immutable". You are verbose.

> > That probably makes it unsuitable for general use anyway.
> 
> I guess that your class "Glib::Variant" makes it more convenient to work with 
> them. Does it support to reset such a C++ variable to an instance which will be 
> marked as "nothing"?

No.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]