Re: libglademm and signal autoconnect (implemented)

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 09:18 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > As I've just mentioned in the bug report, I don't find it acceptable to
> > hard-code references to every widget's signals in libglademm (or
> > Gtk::Builder). Not only would that be a massive list for all of gtkmm's
> > objects, which we'd have to keep up-to-date, but that list could not
> > contain signals for objects/widgets that are not part of gtkmm, such as
> > gtksourceviewmm or libgnomedbmm.
> There is a new patch at the tracker
> for some time now, that addresses
> this and your other concern about
> hacking around the libglade's private
> structures.
> In fact, it is now just a tiny wrapper
> around the gtk_builder_connect_signals_full(),
> which is probably the best way of
> implementing that.
> Have you happened to take a look?
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573482

It's only been a few days. I get email for every gtkmm change in
bugzilla. I will get to it.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com