Re: Gtkmm Windows installers available

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 13:52 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 06:15 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 22:50 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote:
> > > Yes. We will have to think of a naming convention for those binaries.
> > > gtkmm-2.4-vc9.dll? (in contrast to gtkmm-2.4.dll for VS 2005, which we
> > > might then rename to gtkmm-2.4-vc8.dll, possibly breaking compatibility)
> 
> If we use the boost conventions, as suggested by Cedric on your blog,
> then it would probably look like "gtkmm-vc90-(d-)2_4.dll".
> 
> Should we do the same for the MSVC2005 DLLs?

Sounds good to me.

>  And while we are at it, we
> could do the same for the property sheets (to, say,
> gtkmm-vc80-(d-)2_4.vsprops). We probably just need to keep the old ones,
> so existing projects can still find them.

Yes, please. Make sure that duplication is documented on the "building"
page, please.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com