Re: Gtkmm Windows installers available

[Armin Burgmeier <armin arbur net>]

On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 06:15 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 22:50 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote:
> > Yes. We will have to think of a naming convention for those binaries.
> > gtkmm-2.4-vc9.dll? (in contrast to gtkmm-2.4.dll for VS 2005, which we
> > might then rename to gtkmm-2.4-vc8.dll, possibly breaking compatibility)

If we use the boost conventions, as suggested by Cedric on your blog,
then it would probably look like "gtkmm-vc90-(d-)2_4.dll".

Should we do the same for the MSVC2005 DLLs? And while we are at it, we
could do the same for the property sheets (to, say,
gtkmm-vc80-(d-)2_4.vsprops). We probably just need to keep the old ones,
so existing projects can still find them.

Armin