Re: Static builds

[Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose gmx de>]

Paul Davis schrieb:
> On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 20:10 +0100, Sebastian wrote:
>
> > 1)    I'll have to carry around
> >    the program itself for all the operating systems used
> >   + the libs for all the operating systems used
>
> there will be essentially no more code than if you do a static link,
> except of course that you will get, for example, all of GTK+ rather than
> just the parts you use. one way or another, your "distribution" has to
> contain everything your app needs; its either statically linked *into*
> the binary, or it sits "next to it" as "private shared libraries".
>
> >   + some working script like the one above for all operating systems used,
>
> the script will be more or less identical on most systems.

Agreed. But it's not very handy for some users.

> >  which is a no go.
> >
> > 2)   This is the wrong list for this question :-)
>
> probably true.

Thanks for your answers.
It's said that I have to use Qt to achieve such  a simple thing. The 
suggested method and it's result is simply not what I can hand out to 
customers.

I remember this question was asked some month ago by someone else to and 
I guess there many more programmers searching for a great lib like this 
to use for simple static builds, who just don't ask, but decide to use 
something else.


Thanks again,

  Sebastian


begin:vcard
fn:Sebastian Rose
n:Rose;Sebastian
email;internet:sebastian_rose gmx de
title:Fachinformatiker/Anwendendungsentwicklung
tel;cell:+49 173 / 83 93 417
note;quoted-printable:Entwicklung  von Internetanwendungen und Programmen  mit  freien  Werkzeu=
	gen  und Bibliotheken.=0D=0A=
	=0D=0A=
	PHP, Java, C/C++,  Bash,  Perl,  Apache, MySQL,  PostgreSQL, xt::commerce=
	, Typo3, Server,  Netzwerk,  Desktop, Datenbank, gtkmm=0D=0A=
	
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard